Skip to the content

Media Tricks Exposed

Media Manipulation

Home
Show All
Random

Search for:

FAKE SCIENCE: 90% of Researchers agreed that ‘there is a crisis of reproducibility’ in their field

MediaTricks | January 24, 2022

NATURE article screenshot: "1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility." Survey sheds light on the ‘crisis’ rocking research.

More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments, and more than half have failed to reproduce their own experiments. Those are some of the telling figures that emerged from Nature's survey of 1,576 researchers who took a brief online questionnaire on reproducibility in research.

The data reveal sometimes-contradictory attitudes towards reproducibility. Although 52% of those surveyed agree that there is a significant 'crisis' of reproducibility, less than 31% think that failure to reproduce published results means that the result is probably wrong, and most say that they still trust the published literature.

Data on how much of the scientific literature is reproducible are rare and generally bleak. The best-known analyses, from psychology1 and cancer biology2, found rates of around 40% and 10%, respectively. Our survey respondents were more optimistic: 73% said that they think that at least half of the papers in their field can be trusted, with physicists and chemists generally showing the most confidence.

Failing to reproduce results is a rite of passage, says Marcus Munafo, a biological psychologist at the University of Bristol, UK, who has a long-standing interest in scientific reproducibility. When he was a student, he says, “I tried to replicate what looked simple from the literature, and wasn't able to. Then I had a crisis of confidence, and then I learned that my experience wasn't uncommon.”

The challenge is not to eliminate problems with reproducibility in published work. Being at the cutting edge of science means that sometimes results will not be robust, says Munafo. “We want to be discovering new things but not generating too many false leads.”

52% agreed: “there is a significant crisis”

38% agreed: “there is a slight crisis”

70% have been unable to reproduce a study’s findings

aka the science is garbage

Categories: Science Tags: experiment

Related

Scientific American, Before and After

Facts don't work, they say

To promote the Transsexual lobby, the Democrat media has defined women out of existence

Biochemist Chased Off Wikipedia by Marxist Feminists For Referencing 'Politically Incorrect' Researc...

Most Climate Science Doesn't Follow the Scientific Method

FRAUD: How much of Science is fake? Scientists don't know and don't care

Shuffle
Filter
Artificial Intelligence Camera Tricks Censorship CIA Climate CNN Covid Culture Rot Doublethink Facebook Fact Checkers Fake Grassroots Family Gender Globalism Google Government Great Awakening Hollywood Influencers Migration News Corporations Propaganda Psychological PsyOp Groups Quotes Race Repeaters Science Social Media The BBC TV Twitter War Wikipedia YouTube
Spread MediaTricks.org, because when things are not as they seem, there are probably bad actors afoot.