Inoculation works because it exposes people to counter-arguments, making them think about and rehearse rebuttals. When they hear stronger versions of the arguments in the future, they pay less attention to them, and perceive them to be easily dismissed. One example would be how the media portrayed anti-vaxxers as being fearful of 5G microchips in the needles. You see it in movies and TV shows too, where people like conservatives are shown losing political arguments easily or becoming easily convinced by shallow, non-convincing arguments for which they have no answer.
The goal is to convince the propaganda victim that their beliefs are correct, and they should ignore all future challenges to their belief system. They are thus resistant to all persuasion, despite being unable to answer the stronger arguments.
This is one of the classic examples from persuasion research. The unreliability of eyewitness testimony, and the power of leading questions.
Participants were more likely to say the cars were going faster when asked “How fast were they going when the cars smashed into each other?” compared to “How fast were they going when the cars bumped into each other?”
By changing one simple word in the description of an event the participants had just witnessed, researchers could bias their answers and rewrite their memories without anybody knowing it had happened.
The media manipulation empire has been studying human psychology for generations. It knows precisely how to bias responses to certain events by controlling some of the simplest language patterns.
This is why news sites deleted all their comment sections. This is why they censor you on social media.This is why companies and campaigns hire content farms to bury dissent beneath a flood of approval.
They know the research shows dissenting comments reduce the persuasiveness of their propaganda, while likes and approving comments have no such persuasive power.
Dissenting comments are more persuasive than high numbers of likes.
Dissenting comments reduce the persuasiveness of news article content.
Comments in agreement with article content have no such persuasive impact.
Josh Daws, the host of The Great Awokening podcast, explains:
I’m seeing a lot of people on the right share this meme. While it may be a strong satirical response to those who get lost in nuance, it fundamentally fails to recognize why the left wants to talk to your kids about sexuality. Let’s connect some dots.
The left doesn’t want to diddle kids. They want to create little revolutionaries. To do that they need to sever the bond between students and the parents they believe are raising their children to be hateful bigots.
In order to sever the bond between parents and their children, the left is using a two-pronged approach.Critical Race Theory (CRT) and radical gender ideology(properly known as Queer Theory) are not two unrelated sets of ideas. They are two parts of the same strategy.
CRT is usually the first set of ideas to be introduced. This is often enough to radicalize racial minorities, but it’s merely step one for white (or white adjacent) students. CRT instills in these students a negative self-identity as they’re taught to believe they’re recipients of enormous privilege that was stolen from others and that they are complicit in historic and ongoing injustice. In child terms, they’re taught to believe they’re bad. Apart from the shame and guilt, this also gives them a worldview at odds with the one their parents grew up with and are trying to pass on to their kids. Step one is complete.
Once CRT is done tearing down these kids and leaving them with a negative self-identity, Queer Theory (QT) is introduced and offers them a wide assortment of positive self-identities to choose from.
Instead of living with the shame and guilt of being a member of the oppressive dominant culture, these students can be celebrated for coming out as gender nonbinary or pansexual.
In an instant, these kids can trade their negative self-identity and all the accompanying guilt and shame of being an “oppressor” for a positive self-identity as a much-venerated “oppressed” minority.
At this point, the left desperately wants this new identity to stay at school so it has time to be cemented before the parents find out. In the guise of helping these students, schools withhold this information about their child’s new identity from mom and dad. Once the parents do find out about their child’s new identity it’s firmly in place and an adversarial relationship between the child and parents has been manufactured. It takes extraordinarily deft parenting to repair the relationship once it has reached this stage. The parents’ tendency will be to overreact and push the child further into the arms of the woke radicals who now have the little revolutionary they wanted from the beginning. The bond between parents and child has been severed ending the perpetuation of hate and bigotry.
The left is determined to replicate this process in as many families as they can using whatever means at their disposal. It’s not about diddling kids. It’s about capturing the minds of impressionable children. Unfortunately, this creates environments where actual predators can thrive. When young children are isolated from their parents, encouraged to adopt different beliefs, and keep secrets from their parents, they are made easy targets for abusers.
Hear me loud and clear on this. Most teachers love the kids in their classrooms and want only the best for them. They have had their empathy *for* these students weaponized *against* them by leftist activists promoting educational programs that sound nice and caring. Highly empathetic teachers are being used to promote this agenda unaware of its insidious purpose. An example: I recently saw a teacher at a Christian school announce that she would no longer be using the words “mom”, “dad”, or “parents” in her classroom. Her reason? She had just read a paper on the importance of making kids from non-traditional families feel included. She suggested replacing “Donuts with Dads” with “Bagels with Buds” or something of the such. This sounds like a very considerate thing to do for kids who might feel different because they don’t have a dad or live with their grandparents, but its purpose is to subtly chip away at the very idea of the normative nuclear family (a stated goal of the BLM organization.)
Christians who think that we can embrace the ideas from CRT and reject radical gender ideology need to realize how the former is used to prepare kids to accept the latter.
These are your kids we’re talking about. The left wants them. They would love to sever your bond with them. They think your appeals to childhood innocence are an attempt to force heteronormativity on them. Seriously. They write papers on it. It’s not a secret agenda.
@ConceptualJames has recorded a three-part series walking through this entire agenda by looking at primary sources. I highly recommend all parents invest the time to listen to them.
«
Prev
1
/
1
Next
»
Groomer Schools 1: The Long Cultural Marxist History of Sex Education
Groomer Schools 2: Queer Futurity and the Sexual Abuse of Your Children
Groomer Schools 3: The Creation of an American Red Guard
The meme I opened this with is an easy response to the insanity we’re seeing today, but it’s not a great explanation. We should take the time to help people see how nice-sounding programs are being used in the classroom to create little activists and put kids in danger.
Even something as simple as the constant assault on our senses from ugly art; it allows them to get away with their ugly crime and corruption without raising our innate defence mechanisms.
Dancing mania (also known as dancing plague) was a social phenomenon that … involved groups of people dancing erratically, sometimes thousands at a time … until they collapsed from exhaustion and injuries.
Imagine the spread of dysfunctional social contagions now that social media has burst onto the scene..
Language Tricks Media Disinformation Agents Use To Manipulate You
looming on the horizon looming threat heating up imminent an uptick a spike a surge crisis unprecedented uncertain times trying times danger to our democracy threatens our values a direct threat to attack on our institutions undermines faith in undermines the public trust worrying levels of at an alarming rate potentially a risk of is a symptom of expected / suspected amid rising concerns there is concern growing concern rising tensions upheaval
———
impassioned sends a powerful message and it’s beautiful here’s why that’s a good/bad thing here’s how to think about ___ because of course it is safe and effective settled science trust the science it’s clear it feels like brave heart-breaking empowering disenfranchised marginalised get educated / uneducated the wrong/right side of history history won’t be kind to dustbin of history systemic dismantle decolonise the conversation reimagining so this never happens again a lot to unpack whiteness social construct part of the problem it’s not who we are opening a dialog come together tolerant open and inclusive undocumented on both sides deplatform the ___ community global goals our shared values hetero-normative women and people of color
———
independent fact checkers verified sources reveal experts agree scholars agree psychologist says the science says scientists predict research suggests studies suggest it’s settled science seems to suggest officials warn authorities advise critics claim according to the experts sources familiar say sources familiar with his thinking according to insiders according to new polls appears to show what appears to be evidence-based scientific consensus studies show new figures show new indicators a new start-up in a press release told reporters announced today most people agree after investigation valid concerns widely seen as widely recognised as overwhelming believed to be this is where we stand there is no debate this is what we know it’s irrefutable
———
misinformation disinformation unfounded debunked rumours baseless nonsense blatantly false widely disputed roundly dismissed falsely claims the false claim makes inaccurate claims about claims without evidence alleged spreading conspiracy theories a crackpot notion taking root his obsession with sprung up online propagated by pushing the belief advancing the idea peddling it’s unclear if
———
controversial objectionable not normal bizarre strange problematic deeply concerning disturbing gross dark shocking sickening dangerous horrific unnerving disquieting scary terrifying pervasive divisive
———
conspiracy theorist truther anti- anti-vaxxer Qanon fringe beliefs fringe groups privileged toxic far right hard right extreme right alt right radicalized white supremacist neo-nazi fascist denier science denier climate denier hesitant hateful hate-filled insurrectionist extremist radical racist anti-semitic homophobic transphobic islamophobic
———
his/her rhetoric blasts targets stokes attacks slams rips opens fire lashes out spewing amplified give oxygen to provoking bombshell trope canard dog whistle emboldened a culture of has a habit of a familiar tactic sparks outrage catches flak rant a vile screed loses his temper ill-tempered incites inciting violence attempting to undermine is very confused about hate speech spreading hate rings hollow in bad faith tone deaf has no place in a ___ society
This guy actually thinks culture means whatever garbage propaganda the media is pumping out at the time. Sad!
The media machine works tirelessly to make every Western nation forget their traditions, their habits, cultural preferences, and their aesthetic ideals. Why? To turn every person into an interchangeable, mindless, corporate-branded, detached-from-history, government-owned, cog in a sick machine. If you have forgotten your history and identity, your borders can be flung open, your country can be sold off to the highest bidder or ripped to shreds, and everything stopping the centralized corporate takeover of the earth gets liquidated. The twin evils of destruction—Corporatism and Communism—must first destroy Traditionalism in order to succeed in their conquest of Earth. This is why we see both of these evils propping each other up, in everything from wars to daily propaganda, fighting together for decades against their common enemy. Nationalism and Traditionalism are the only things standing in the way of their ruthless globalist empire.
The media machine floods the airwaves with fakery 24/7, to make you forget what is real.
The hypnosis media mantra: “Don’t reproduce. Abort your children. Replace yourselves with immigrants. Consume then die. Cherish nothing. Destroy your inheritance. Bequeath nothing. Extinguish your genetic line. Throw open your borders. Delete your country. You are a good person.”
❓ Like all empires in history, the Globalist Regime employs PROPAGANDA, REEDUCATION, RESETTLEMENT and GENOCIDE to break the spirit of the individual tribes, ethnicities and nations under its dominion, and produce a uniform rootless global citizen which is easily controlled.
![The outbreaks of dancing mania varied, and several characteristics of it have been recorded. Generally occurring in times of hardship, up to tens of thousands of people would appear to dance for hours, days, weeks, and even months.
Women have often been portrayed in modern literature as the usual participants in dancing mania, although contemporary sources suggest otherwise. Whether the dancing was spontaneous, or an organized event, is also debated. What is certain, however, is that dancers seemed to be in a state of unconsciousness and unable to control themselves.
In his research into social phenomena, author Robert Bartholomew notes that contemporary sources record that participants often did not reside where the dancing took place. Such people would travel from place to place, and others would join them along the way. With them they brought customs and behaviour that were strange to the local people. Bartholomew describes how dancers wore "strange, colorful attire" and "held wooden sticks".
Robert Marks, in his study of hypnotism, notes that some decorated their hair with garlands.[7]: 201 However, not all outbreaks involved foreigners, and not all were particularly calm. Bartholomew notes that some "paraded around naked" and made "obscene gestures". Some even had sexual intercourse. Others acted like animals, and jumped, hopped and leaped about.
They hardly stopped, and some danced until they broke their ribs and subsequently died. Throughout, dancers screamed, laughed, or cried, and some sang. Bartholomew also notes that observers of dancing mania were sometimes treated violently if they refused to join in. Participants demonstrated odd reactions to the color red; in A History of Madness in Sixteenth-Century Germany, Midelfort notes they "could not perceive the color red at all", and Bartholomew reports "it was said that dancers could not stand... the color red, often becoming violent on seeing [it]".](https://mediatricks.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/dancing-mania.png)
