Social Media
Twitter co-founder Biz Stone says there were “world events” that the company “didn’t make public”
While discussing Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa374/fa3745d82f9706fd261c7f6c7e619fd4a83f8d8d" alt="Twitter co-founder Biz Stone tweet thread:
Biz Stone tweeted: He’s not a serious person. He does things for sport that have serious consequences for real people. This is an open, global service. US politics is not much of Twitter. (K-pop might be bigger.) Also, in other places lives are at stake.
Jason Goldman replies: This is the most painful part and where I get worked up. Honestly if the thing just died in a fire so be it. Sites die. But he’s acting with such a reckless and incurious disregard to the consequences of his actions. Because he’s never had to deal with any.
Biz Stone replies to Goldman: It’s heartbreaking. All the world events we didn’t make public to protect brave people. Also, on the Trump poll, “The people have spoken!” How many Russians voted? It’s global. That’s not what we made it for…Chief. Oy."
Stone worked at Twitter from its founding in 2006 until 2012, and he re-joined the company in 2017.
Many people have asked Stone what world events they buried, but he has ignored all questions.
What have they been hiding? It sure sounds like a CIA thing.
Researchers discover Google sends fewer ‘Go Vote’ reminders to conservatives than to liberals and centrists in swing states, secretly shifting millions of undecided votes leftward
See more posts from this researcher: Dr Robert Epstein
The researcher is a Democrat, a Hillary voter, and he has had enough of Big Tech monopolies manipulating the results of elections.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6721c/6721c3784203a4342fa0d911f30be70666e89d49" alt="Article screenshot from The Epoch Times: "How Google Stopped the Red Wave." Google and other tech companies want you obsessing about conspiracy theories so you won’t look at how they tampered with the 2022 midterm elections. By Robert Epstein.
Based on my team’s research, Google, and to a lesser extent, Facebook and other tech monopolies, not only took steps to shift millions of votes to Democrats in the midterms, but they are using their influence to spread rumors and conspiracy theories to make sure people look everywhere for explanations—except at them.
Google isn’t the only culprit, but since they’re the biggest, most aggressive, and most arrogant culprit, I’ll focus on them in this article. Over a period of months, Google nudged undecided voters toward voting blue by showing people politically biased content in their search engine, suppressing content they didn’t want people to see, recommending left-leaning videos on YouTube (pdf) (which Google owns), allegedly sending tens of millions of emails to people’s spam boxes, and sending go-vote reminders on their home page mainly to liberal and moderate voters.
I know Google did these things (and more!) because, in 2022, my team and I were doing to them exactly what they do to us and our kids 24/7: We were monitoring the politically related content that Google and other tech companies were showing to actual voters—our politically diverse panel of 2,742 “field agents,” who were located mainly in swing states.
In particular, we were tracking what Google employees call “ephemeral experiences”—content that appears briefly, affects people, and then disappears. In 2018, in emails that leaked from the company, Googlers were discussing how they might use ephemeral experiences to change people’s views about Trump’s travel ban. They know how powerful ephemeral experiences can be. That’s one of the most closely held secrets of Google’s management.
But we were capturing, aggregating, and analyzing the content that Google and other companies were sending to the computers of our field agents, so we could accurately estimate how many go-vote reminders Google was sending to liberals, moderates, and conservatives. In all, in the weeks leading up to the 2022 midterms, we preserved more than 2.5 million of those persuasive ephemeral experiences.
When we used similar methods to monitor content being sent by tech companies to voters before the 2020 presidential election, we found that Google was sending fewer go-vote reminders to conservatives than to moderates and liberals. Targeted messaging of this sort is a blatant manipulation that can, on Election Day in a national election in the United States, generate 450,000 extra votes for the favored candidate.
In 2020, we reported our findings to members of Congress, and on Nov. 5, 2020, three U.S. senators sent an intimidating letter (pdf) to the CEO of Google that summarized our data. As a result, Google turned off its manipulations. In the Georgia Senate runoffs that followed the presidential election, no one received a go-vote reminder from Google.
But we weren’t so lucky this time around. The article I published just before the election had no effect on Google, and this year, we couldn’t find a member of Congress to send a warning letter, although we came close.
As a result, Google search results remained politically biased on Election Day, and so did the up-next recommendations on YouTube. Google also sent out targeted go-vote reminders in most swing states."
Source: https://archive.ph/mQ9kp
The Persuasive Power of Dissenting Comments
This is why news sites deleted all their comment sections. This is why they censor you on social media. This is why companies and campaigns hire content farms to bury dissent beneath a flood of approval.
They know the research shows dissenting comments reduce the persuasiveness of their propaganda, while likes and approving comments have no such persuasive power.
- Dissenting comments are more persuasive than high numbers of likes.
- Dissenting comments reduce the persuasiveness of news article content.
- Comments in agreement with article content have no such persuasive impact.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f3a1/9f3a1a51c814a5eff9a4dbfdea169304deb08bad" alt="Psychology Study screenshot: "They Came, They Liked, They Commented: Social Influence on Facebook News Channels." by Stephan Winter, Caroline Brückner, and Nicole Kramer; published in Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking.
Due to the increasing importance of social networking sites as sources of information, news media organizations have set up Facebook channels in which they publish news stories or links to articles. This research investigated how journalistic texts are perceived in this new context and how reactions of other users change the influence of the main articles. In an online experiment (N=197), a Facebook posting of a reputable news site and the corresponding article were shown. The type of user comments and the number of likes were systematically varied. Negative comments diminished the persuasive influence of the article, while there were no strengthening effects of positive comments. When readers perceived the topic as personally relevant, comments including relevant arguments were more influential than comments with subjective opinions, which can be explained by higher levels of elaboration. However, against expectations of bandwagon perceptions, a high number of likes did not lead to conformity effects, which suggests that exemplifying comments are more influential than statistical user representations. Results are discussed with regard to effects of news media content and the mechanisms of social influence in Web 2.0."
Bill Gates says he’s building a 3000-person team to spread his propaganda on Social Media
Facebook reveals how Instagram is turning teen girls insane
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d71e/6d71ea0e36f1a7bdabafbd449bfd02381f164341" alt="Facebook Knows Instagram Is Toxic for Teen Girls, Company Documents Show
Its own in-depth research shows a significant teen mental-health issue that Facebook plays down in public
“Thirty-two percent of teen girls said that when they felt bad about their bodies, Instagram made them feel worse,” the researchers said in a March 2020 slide presentation posted to Facebook’s internal message board, reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. “Comparisons on Instagram can change how young women view and describe themselves.”
For the past three years, Facebook has been conducting studies into how its photo-sharing app affects its millions of young users. Repeatedly, the company’s researchers found that Instagram is harmful for a sizable percentage of them, most notably teenage girls.
“We make body image issues worse for one in three teen girls,” said one slide from 2019, summarizing research about teen girls who experience the issues.
“Teens blame Instagram for increases in the rate of anxiety and depression,” said another slide. “This reaction was unprompted and consistent across all groups.”
Among teens who reported suicidal thoughts, 13% of British users and 6% of American users traced the desire to kill themselves to Instagram, one presentation showed."
Source: https://archive.ph/LH7PQ
Twitter Bans People for Saying “Men Aren’t Women”
You are not allowed to disagree with the State-enforced gender ideology. You will be removed from the public conversation. You may even get a visit from the cops. It’s a great way to manufacture fake consensus for unpopular ideas; just delete and threaten everyone who disagrees with you.
![Article screenshot from The Federalist: "Twitter Permanently Bans Feminist For Writing That Men Aren't Women"
Last week, the social media giant permanently banned Meghan Murphy, a writer based in British Columbia, for critiquing transgender ideology online. The platform repeatedly suspended her account for this then ultimately banned her last week, saying such behavior "violated [its] rules against hateful conduct."
At Feminist Current, Murphy writes about her ban:
What is insane to me, though, is that while Twitter knowingly permits graphic pornography and threats on the platform (I have reported countless violent threats, the vast majority of which have gone unaddressed), they won't allow me to state very basic facts, such as 'men aren't women'.](https://mediatricks.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/twitter-bans-basic-truths-men-are-not-women.png)
They have used this rule to clear out many political commentators they want silenced too. If you are not a fully brainwashed left winger, they can find a way to sweep you out of the public conversation. They have defined perfectly normal beliefs as “hate” now, and apply the rules selectively to remove whoever they want.
Publicists buy fake web traffic to pump up the stats of any publicity the media gives their clients
Buying followers is cheaper than you think
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b38e4/b38e4e8ba1763d46dfca11d6d55f6c6716d6086d" alt="Bywex, a clickfarm selling fake Twitter followers.
- Twitter followers.
- Twitter Likes.
- Twitter Retweets.
- Twitter Views.
- Twitter Impressions.
- Twitter Live Video Views.
- Twitter Poll Votes."
You can even buy fake YouTube livestream viewers, and many other things.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5fd5/d5fd5015e4b75ef0cbe76063cf45c03b26c616a6" alt="Bywex, clickfarm selling fake YouTube viewers.
- YouTube Live Views - Pre-Premiere Waiting Viewers Instant.
- YouTube Live Views - Active Live Stream Views - Monetizable."
You can see the other Scam Tricks they sell here:
https://smm.bywex.com/services
Celebrities and influencers will tweet your words for money and you can hire them easily
SponsoredTweets.com has got you covered.
Money talks… using celebrity mouths
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0583/d0583f8aed92f28f9f4b61608afb45bccee38db2" alt="SponsoredTweets.com screenshot: Twitter Influencer Discovery Tool. Search for Twitter influencers to hire for your next influencer marketing campaign. Search Twitter Influencers."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccedb/ccedbaefcb048fcb0e1ac68ecde6cf6a79176e7b" alt="SponsoredTweets.com screenshot: Audience and Creator Segmentation.
Refine search results based on filters relative to the creator's audience or profile. Search Twitter Influencers.
Filters: Audience Location, Audience Gender, Audience Age, Audience Language, etc"
What is Astroturfing?
MPs curate their speeches in Parliament to avoid Big Tech Censorship, says Australian MP
Hillary’s multi-million dollar Troll Army targeted Bernie supporters online
They hide hashtags for political topics they don’t want you to know the truth about
Big Tech Worker Reveals Corporate Rot (and Collapse of Staff Morale)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80d2d/80d2d35491543994c6256056303187b9c8fd1d76" alt="Tweet screenshot: Hazard Harrington @HazardHarringto writes: I work in Big Tech. A name you would know and have probably used before. Wanted to give a rundown of what it's like from the inside right now."
I work in Big Tech. A name you would know and have probably used before. Wanted to give a rundown of what it's like from the inside right now. Obviously insanely radically leftwing. BLM/LGBTQ. Trans flags hanging in office. Pronouns stated before meetings. Special affiliation groups for everyone but white men. All what you'd expect. But COVID/WFH (work from home) has totally broken people. They are fundamentally weak, often with no social support outside of work. They're the people with no children, no spouse. Only a dog or cat for emotional support. There's constant talk, even now, about how hard things are for everyone. Often meetings start with going around the room to ask "How is everyone feeling?" Literally everyone else went on sad rants about their lives. "I'm so MAD a white supremacist shot 3 black men in Kenosha!" It's toxic. When it got to me, I said "Good." and then a (((lady engineer))) literally proposed that we should not be allowed to answer the question positively. I shit you not. I think it hurt her that I wasn't as miserable as her. She made some argument about "vulnerability". These people not only want you weak, they want you to expose your vulnerabilities to them so they can exploit them. They may not intend this explicitly, but whatever twisted ideology they worship ends with this result. So back to morale. Everyone is demoralized. This may surprise you, since Big Tech is extremely well paid and has been able to WFH throughout the past 2 years. They've been given extra days off, extra stipends, bonuses, etc. They never had to fear being laid off. I have some sympathy, and can feel some of this myself. It's normal and natural to work with people in-person. WFH can make it easy to overwork. You take fewer breaks, often work past normal working hours. You don't feel connected to customers or celebrate success in person. And as I mentioned, Big Tech is often the only social life for people. I fortunately never made it mine, but my company had all sorts of after-work activities. Sports leagues, game nights, different classes taught by employees. There was a rhythm and connectedness that's gone. The Great Resignation is real. Many employees are leaving for better jobs. Remote work has (so far) resulted in more job opportunities for those working in Big Tech, especially outside of Silicon Valley. And so we backfill those positions, or hire new people, all remote. We now have employees who have nearly 2 years of tenure who have never met another employee in person, and lives alone in some city away from where the office was. This would be fine for a normal person, but again, we're attracting the family-less urbanites scared of even meeting up with their friends at a restaurant. The churn in jobs also has the major effect of constantly dealing with the overhead of re-assinging projects from people leaving, and onboarding new people. The new employees don't get enough attention to succeed. And the employees that stay end up with a load of work dumped by the former coworkers, plus the responsibility of onboarding the new ones. There are many software engineers who've not written a single line of code in the past year. While the Woke agitation has slowed due to the productive employees' ability to simply log off, in addition to the tiredness of the agitators, there is more and more open rebellion regarding pay and profits. "Bring your whole self to work" was the Big Tech mantra. Tell people about your cool hobbies, share your politics (if you're far left only), share your sex life. This plus the feeling of distance an online-only presence creates has made people braver in speaking their thoughts. You used to have to have the balls to knock on the CEOs office door, or schedule a meeting. Now you can fire off a nasty Slack message straight to her. People will openly write threads and comments throughout Slack bad-mouthing the higher ups at the company. And they do nothing. It's unreal what people will write, with no recourse. If it were anything remotely RW, I'm certain they'd be immediately fired, but so long as they're sufficiently LW or minority (anything but straight white man), they can agitate, complain, do no work, and continue employment. And so the entire company has devolved. We're running on the code written in years past. No major new product initatives are being launched. Workers complain that they're understaffed and demoralized. People take constant sick days, or don't show up at all without record. It's very easy to hide when WFH. With such a flux in employees/management and so much allowance for "mental health", it's easy to simply no show without punishment. We hired a new employee and I pinged them at 1pm to see if they'd join a meeting. They came 10 minutes later. Said they slept in because they didn't have anything to work on. It's got to be mind-boggling for someone not in software. On a given day, managers (there are several in weird matrix structure) will say things like "What can I do to support you?" "Do you have enough to work on? Too much?" It's like emotional support. And you can simply say, "Oh, I've had a hard week. Barely slept. Felt sick. Don't think I can handle much more this week." There's no real accountability to anyone. Record profits at the top, because of existing code and product-market fit cruising along, so leaders don't notice. It's utterly surreal to watch the deterioration. To see how quickly an organization can crumble. And I'm not productive either. I'm constantly bombarded with anti-white, anti-male, woke propaganda. We've even had explicit discussions of assigning less work to URMs (under-represented minorities), because "life is really hard for them right now." This suggestion was from a lesbian white woman with cats. As productive as one person can be, you can't add value when constantly thwarted. Nobody in IT doing tickets anymore to provision things for you, large bureaucracy to gatekeep any actions (needs review by X number of committees including now DEI committees). It's hard to feel unproductive. I'm not the type who feels great about getting paid to not work, but that's essentially what I've been doing for the last year. This problem is the worst in Big Tech, so if Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Amazon Prime, or Netflix go down, the world will probably be better off. It's not essential. I worry about this apathy spreading to companies that matter. Ones that write software for utilities. I know this isn't just my company because I've interviewed at many other companies (Big Tech and Unicorns). Awful conduct at interviews. Demoralized employees who show up late, unprepared, or absolutely do not want to be there. Things my coworkers spend an enormous amount of their day on: - Coming up with a "clever" new Zoom background each day (something Harry Potter or Star Wars like children) - Clever Slack emojis - Reddit style responses in threads ("First!) and other low brow irony for the lulz. I've interviewed many times wanting to leave, but every comparable company how has a "Diversity Panel" interview, which is just a matter of gatekeeping ideological purity at these companies. They ask questions like: "Why is diversity important to you?" and "What have you done to increase diversity at your company?" In one interview, they re-asked me 3 times because they weren't satisfied that I was ideologically pure enough. I value diversity of experience, they were wanting me as a white man to apologize for my sin of being born.
Source: https://archive.is/s8jDw
Political Operative & Hillary Democrat Caught Running 50+ Fake Twitter Accounts, Using Profile Photos of Dead People
Twitter Wipes Hashtags Clean To Protect The Corruptocracy
Google has only a few hundred results for any search term, but pretends it has billions
Twitter is Rigged Worldwide
Twitter and LinkedIn Ban Inventor of mRNA Vaccines for Opposing Covid Jabs
Dr Robert Malone has consistently fought against the rollout of the experimental covid injections. Also, he speaks out against the tyrannical ruling elite—The Covid Regime. For this, he has been wiped from the web by the Big Tech cartel.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b52c/4b52c5b66207d85451052c8eae8578e84c000e4e" alt="Robert W Malone, MD. @RWMaloneMD
Account Suspended.
Step 1: All the scientists agree.
Step 2: Here's a scientist that doesn't
Step 3: <censored>
Step 4: All the scientists agree."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfa0e/bfa0ea7b28ae50786a70f93d45ad47215453e581" alt="THE EPOCH TIMES.
Dr. Robert Malone, who invented mRNA vaccine technology.
LinkedIn Deletes Account of mRNA Vaccine Pioneer Who Questioned Risks of COVID-19 Shots."
You can follow him on Telegram here