coordination
Researchers discover Google sends fewer ‘Go Vote’ reminders to conservatives than to liberals and centrists in swing states, secretly shifting millions of undecided votes leftward
See more posts from this researcher: Dr Robert Epstein
The researcher is a Democrat, a Hillary voter, and he has had enough of Big Tech monopolies manipulating the results of elections.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6721c/6721c3784203a4342fa0d911f30be70666e89d49" alt="Article screenshot from The Epoch Times: "How Google Stopped the Red Wave." Google and other tech companies want you obsessing about conspiracy theories so you won’t look at how they tampered with the 2022 midterm elections. By Robert Epstein.
Based on my team’s research, Google, and to a lesser extent, Facebook and other tech monopolies, not only took steps to shift millions of votes to Democrats in the midterms, but they are using their influence to spread rumors and conspiracy theories to make sure people look everywhere for explanations—except at them.
Google isn’t the only culprit, but since they’re the biggest, most aggressive, and most arrogant culprit, I’ll focus on them in this article. Over a period of months, Google nudged undecided voters toward voting blue by showing people politically biased content in their search engine, suppressing content they didn’t want people to see, recommending left-leaning videos on YouTube (pdf) (which Google owns), allegedly sending tens of millions of emails to people’s spam boxes, and sending go-vote reminders on their home page mainly to liberal and moderate voters.
I know Google did these things (and more!) because, in 2022, my team and I were doing to them exactly what they do to us and our kids 24/7: We were monitoring the politically related content that Google and other tech companies were showing to actual voters—our politically diverse panel of 2,742 “field agents,” who were located mainly in swing states.
In particular, we were tracking what Google employees call “ephemeral experiences”—content that appears briefly, affects people, and then disappears. In 2018, in emails that leaked from the company, Googlers were discussing how they might use ephemeral experiences to change people’s views about Trump’s travel ban. They know how powerful ephemeral experiences can be. That’s one of the most closely held secrets of Google’s management.
But we were capturing, aggregating, and analyzing the content that Google and other companies were sending to the computers of our field agents, so we could accurately estimate how many go-vote reminders Google was sending to liberals, moderates, and conservatives. In all, in the weeks leading up to the 2022 midterms, we preserved more than 2.5 million of those persuasive ephemeral experiences.
When we used similar methods to monitor content being sent by tech companies to voters before the 2020 presidential election, we found that Google was sending fewer go-vote reminders to conservatives than to moderates and liberals. Targeted messaging of this sort is a blatant manipulation that can, on Election Day in a national election in the United States, generate 450,000 extra votes for the favored candidate.
In 2020, we reported our findings to members of Congress, and on Nov. 5, 2020, three U.S. senators sent an intimidating letter (pdf) to the CEO of Google that summarized our data. As a result, Google turned off its manipulations. In the Georgia Senate runoffs that followed the presidential election, no one received a go-vote reminder from Google.
But we weren’t so lucky this time around. The article I published just before the election had no effect on Google, and this year, we couldn’t find a member of Congress to send a warning letter, although we came close.
As a result, Google search results remained politically biased on Election Day, and so did the up-next recommendations on YouTube. Google also sent out targeted go-vote reminders in most swing states."
Source: https://archive.ph/mQ9kp
How Associated Press Pushes a Narrative To The Entire Media
Controlled Media Caught Again, All Reading From The Same Script
Bill Gates says he’s building a 3000-person team to spread his propaganda on Social Media
Media Pretends Putin Killed a Woman in a Suitcase, Instead of the Boyfriend Who Confessed
Girl who “slammed” Putin a year ago was strangled to death by her ex-boyfriend.
The media sloppers know most people only read headlines, and hardly any read the small print. So, let’s just blame Putin.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78363/78363aeb2dbc7feddee9aff826550b9e6f1a12ef" alt="Fox News article: "Russian model who trashed Putin on social media found dead in suitcase"
A Russian model who called Vladimir Putin a "psychopath" has been found dead and stuffed inside a suitcase, a report says. Gretta Vedler, 23, went missing a year ago after her anti-Putin social media rant, but the two events do not appear to be connected.
"Vedler's ex-boyfriend Dmitry Korovin, 23, has now confessed to strangling her to death before driving her 300 miles to the Lipetsk region and abandoning the body in the boot of a car.." the Daily Star reports.
Fox News brands Putin with "CLEAR PSYCHOPATHY" despite his lack of involvement."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6afeb/6afeb3df1b2fb8010c2a6fb84a3ac75d66559c21" alt="Daily Star: "Russian model who called Putin 'psychopath' found dead in suitcase after year missing""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd452/fd45281b0b0f1e8d9095d9f167fa6327ee101126" alt="NEW YORK POST: "Russian model who trashed Putin on social media found dead in suitcase" by Pilar Arias"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2151c/2151ce10c78b00fd22ade2a65923ad01aa8affbd" alt="METRO News: "Russian model who branded Putin a 'psychopath' found dead in suitcase", fake news story by Sam Corbishley."
If they are willing to lie about something as obvious as this, what wouldn’t they lie about?
The propaganda machine pushes hoax after hoax, day after day. They are in the business of perception control, not honest reporting. Information suppression and perception control. Oh well, it’s a good job hardly anyone trusts them anymore.
The hunger for Blackrock investment cash is a big reason why corporations Go Woke
What is Astroturfing?
The Guardian kicks off the mainstream media censorship campaign against Substack
They go on to name Substack’s payment processor in a bid to get things shut down.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3b39/c3b39a904d4b9b10bab69a6644055ce120eccd0e" alt="Article screenshot from The Guardian, written by Dan Milmo: Anti-vaxxers making ‘at least $2.5m’ a year from publishing on Substack.
Center for Countering Digital Hate research calculates that anti-vaccine figures could be making $12.5m from the online platform.
A group of vaccine-sceptic writers are generating revenues of at least $2.5m (£1.85m) a year from publishing newsletters for tens of thousands of followers on the online publishing platform Substack, according to new research.
Prominent figures in the anti-vaccine movement including Dr Joseph Mercola and Alex Berenson have large followings on Substack, which has more than 1 million paying subscribers who sign up for individual newsletters from an array of authors who include novelist Salman Rushdie, the writer musician Patti Smith and former Downing Street adviser Dominic Cummings."
Opposing experimental vaccines is “hate” now, and the Center for Countering Digital Hate will come after you. Who funds this censorship advocacy group? They won’t say. But the corrupt media sure does love them.
They made a bizarre 1 minute video trying to make scientific debate seem ominous:
Democrat Party gives pre-written articles to journalists, and proofreads articles before publication
Twitter is Rigged Worldwide
Amazon Censoring Book Reviews For Chinese President
The Beauty Magazine Monopoly
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1dc9/f1dc92b2dc900537870ad45aaad8c08ace1a94be" alt=""
All pumping out the same Cultural Marxist racial propaganda… one media conglomerate pretending to be a leftist social consensus:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f6e3/1f6e30d364a535d0784c574d784b582c6a7a28c1" alt="Women's Health, Elle, and Cosmopolitan all pushing the same social propaganda. All owned by the Hearst corporation."
Some of the assets owned by the Hearst corporation:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b3db/6b3db623cacd79b4bc08d194f8f56a71a7530eab" alt="Newspaper and Magazine Assets of the Hearst Communications corporation."
Source: https://aliseelaine.wordpress.com/2020/10/12/my-favorite-beauty-magazines-look-alike
Did you believe this lie when they were pumping it out 24/7?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cad1f/cad1f4fd7ee263b1aefcebab0b9af55d771f4628" alt="trump bashes migrants bloomberg lie"
Trump only ever opposed illegal immigration. The dope liberals and the media scum pretended not to know the difference. Trump in fact called for higher rates of legal immigration, for unknown reasons. This didn’t stop the media from churning out their “Trump hates immigrants” lies. Many people fell for it.
Even that infamous line, “Trump said Mexicans are rapists” was a lie also. He never said these words. The media propagandists cut off the start and end of what he did say, which revealed he was speaking of the sick illegal border crossing gangs and human traffickers. They literally cut off “but I speak to the border guards and they tell me what we’re getting”. Did you fall for that one?
Of course, the Southern border was and remains a rape hellzone for millions of women and girls per year.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83903/8390354cbde8a1702d3546ac66f24039fc1c36a8" alt=""
Hunter Biden Media Protection
Documentary Exposing Antifa Street Thugs Deleted by YouTube and Vimeo
When they all pretended to debunk Pizzagate
…and that’s a good thing
YouTube Bans Undercover Video of Google Staff Talking About Rigging Elections
Google and Apple Ban Free Speech Social Networks from App Stores For Refusing to Censor Users
With a combined 98% control of the mobile marketplace, Google and Apple set the terms on what is allowed to be expressed and what is not. If you refuse to censor people who express non-left wing viewpoints, your app will be deleted from the app stores.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fcc12/fcc1261384f0d3beb628a5f9602e36cdc628ba96" alt=""
Mega corporations constraining human expression for Marxist ideals is 21st century life until we overthrow them.